New Page 6
The Public Is Kept in the Dark About Many Medical Issues
Medical Journal in its February
28, 2012 issue published a rather remarkable article by Deborah Cohen,
Investigations Editor at BMJ, titled “Joint BMJ / BBC Newsnight investigation
raises new concerns over hip implants, which may affect more people than the
breast implant scandal.” 
First, I want to applaud BMJ for pointing out that the hip implant scandal may
affect more people than the breast implant scandal. However, how many more
people—especially innocent children—are being affected by the vaccine scandal?
Why are so many young children contracting so many unheard of medical syndromes
that did not appear in the medical literature 50 or more years ago, e.g.,
Autism, ADD, ADHD, childhood cancers, and something termed “Shaken Baby
Syndrome” that may be vaccine-related brain damage from multivalent vaccines,
especially when no physical trauma presents on the infant’s body. See my 2-part
series how bone density tests can disprove Shaken Baby Syndrome published at
International Medical Council on Vaccination February 5, 2012
and February 9, 2012 http://www.vaccinationcouncil.org/2012/02/09/bone-density-shaken-baby-syndrome-part-2-by-catherine-j-frompovich/.
Second, if the BMJ is willing to admit that medical scandals have occurred
regarding hip and breast implants, why is it so reluctant to investigate the
parallel rise in childhood chronic disease rates, seizures, and behavioral
problems that coincide with the ever increasing mandated childhood vaccination
schedules since the 1980s?
Third, the investigation that occurred in the United Kingdom faults regulators
in both the UK and United States for keeping patients in the dark about the
DePuy Orthopaedics (a Johnson & Johnson Company) metal-on-metal hip implants
that have been found to be releasing metal ions, which may be carcinogenic
because of the genotoxic risks of cobalt and chromium ions. The scientific
community has known about those genotoxic risks for more than a year or so—how
about decades! Business as usual, I’d say, since science has known of the
neurotoxic effects of mercury and aluminum for even longer, and no one is
blowing the whistle on neurotoxins in vaccines pumped into infants starting at
birth, then at 2, 4 and 6 months until the child receives a total of 36 before
going to school.
If the BMJ and BBC were so willing to investigate the hip replacement system,
why are they so loath to investigate things like mercury (Thimerosal), aluminum,
formaldehyde, MSG, and an entire witches’ brew of foreign DNA, rDNA, aborted
human fetal tissue, and manufacturing chemicals that are ‘thought’ to induce
immune response but, probably are ‘killing our kids softly’?
Why isn’t BMJ calling for independent third party investigators to delve into
the resurgence of infectious diseases occurring within vaccinated populations
since vaccines are supposed to be ‘disease prevention’ prophylactics? Why is
the public kept in the dark about that?
Since Dr. Cohen states that DePuy knew about hip implant genotoxicity back in
2005, what kind of slap on the wrist do you think DePuy will get? Perhaps
independent investigators ought to scrutinize the UK and FDA approval process
paperwork to find out what was not included that DePuy probably knew about and
should have reported. Much has been written about how the approval process is
skewed in favor of the applicant. Professor Donald W. Light talks about “The
Food and Drug Administration: Inadequate Protection from Serious Risks” in the
Risks of Prescription Drugs (Columbia
University Press, 2010) available on Amazon.com.
Cohen further talks about metal-on-metal hip replacements being subjected to
mechanical testing and not how
it functioned in the human body.  Simulated computer testing is used in a lot
of approval processes within U.S. government agencies and they are fraught with
disastrous results, I think, otherwise healthcare consumers would not be having
all the problems they do with prescription drugs, medical devices, and vaccines.
Probably nothing elucidates safety problems at government approval agencies than
“commercial success trumping safety.” We see that happening routinely in
vaccines, especially the HPV vaccine that is devastating young girls who must
take a course of three toxic-laden injections, with boosters later on in life.
Remember the Swine flu pandemic of 2009? Here’s part of what may have been the
propelling issue to get it ‘mainstreamed’ globally, according to F. Willliam
The man with the nickname “Dr Flu”, Professor Albert Osterhaus, of the Erasmus
University in Rotterdam Holland has been named by Dutch media researchers as the
person at the center of the worldwide Swine Flu H1N1 Influenza A 2009 pandemic
hysteria. Not only is Osterhaus the connecting person in an international
network that has been described as the Pharma Mafia, he is THE key advisor to
WHO on influenza and is intimately positioned to personally profit from the
billions of euros in vaccines allegedly aimed at H1N1. 
Globally, healthcare consumers are waking up to the fact that they may have been
had by media spin and Big Pharma’s post-marketing disasters for pharmaceutical
drugs. Public Citizen, a U.S. watchdog group, seems to be concerned about how
the public is kept in the dark about issues.
There is no issue that the public has been kept in the dark about more than
vaccines, the ‘sacred cash cow’ of modern pharmacology—not medicine. If doctors
really knew what was in those vials, they’d stop acquiescing and, instead of
‘divorcing’ families that want vaccine exemptions from their medical practices,
they would turn down Big Pharma’s commissions they get for vaccinations and live
up to the Hippocratic oath they took.